Free webcam sex personals couples - Dating ward lock red guide

Thus the question arises: who was the audience for this publication?

This point may be examined from a number of angles.

This post takes a critical look, in the form of an article, at how London is represented in a popular guidebook, Gilbert and Henderson observe that “From their inception, with the nineteenth-century handbooks of John Murray and Karl Baedeker, modern systematic guidebooks have been castigated as obvious, plagiarizing, formulaic, even cannibalistic….” An analysis of the content of guidebooks to a particular place may be performed in a number of ways, such as horizontally, looking at a set of different publishers’ books from a single year, or vertically, looking at a series of the same brand of guidebook over time.

This article, however, will pursue a third method of analysis, by examining the content of one particular guidebook in depth, of 1908, which presents an especially deep mine of information about Edwardian London.

Our guidebook specifies that it has in fact been updated, right through mid-1908 (p. Many inclusions demonstrate this currency, such as that “(p. Additionally, our guide reports the building of “the magnificent Roman Catholic Cathedral at Westminster” in 1903, of the War Office in 1907, and of the new Government Offices in June 1908 (p. The maps, too, though undated individually, appear to show the latest information available about street plans and tube stops.

The Kingsway and Aldwych development, for instance, opened by King Edward VII in late 1905, is clearly indicated.

However this density does not seem to have discouraged the sales of the London guide, which was first published in 1878 and was in its fifteenth edition in 1908.

It is notable that unlike other guides of the day, no illustrations (other than plans and maps) are included, and no advertising, the latter due to Baedeker’s firm-wide editorial policy.

However at the time of the 1908 London guide, editorship had passed to Karl’s son Fritz (1844-1925), and unsurprisingly “individual volumes were increasingly the product of a cooperative endeavour involving specialists in different fields and authors of different nationalities.” Gilbert notes that “The handbooks of Murray, Baedeker and their successors often chose to maintain a superficial pretence that they had been written by a single author, but were essentially corporate products, and increasingly were written to a specific formula.” Our 1908 Baedeker’s guide to London generally presents information from what sounds like a single author, but at points tellingly employs the pronoun “‘we”.

Considering the great breadth and depth of information provided, such a team of authors, under one editor, was necessary if the guide was to be kept successfully updated.

Too much emphasis cannot be laid upon the high level of detail of information supplied in the guidebook, almost to the extent of trivia.

Tags: , ,