Anaylysis of pictures and dating sites Chennai pengal sex in web camera

Using the massive stores of data on our platform, we set out to reproduce Ok Cupid’s process (as laid out by the Myths of Profile Pictures post). And in Ok Cupid’s case, it’s reasonable to assume that they got the interesting result they wanted, in part, by cutting out particular populations from their data set. Why did Ok Cupid eliminate users outside of the ages of 18 and 32?We narrowed the demographics of our data set accordingly, matching their 7,140-photo sample. Ok Cupid used a sample of 7,140 photographs from users aged 18-32, in big cities, possessing average attractiveness (that is, they lopped off the top and bottom 20%), and who had profiles containing only one photo and no text. Why did they eliminate users who were most and least attractive?Fact is, these avoidant photos just didn’t exist before the 2010 Ok Cupid study.

anaylysis of pictures and dating sites-18anaylysis of pictures and dating sites-71anaylysis of pictures and dating sites-40

This tip originated on the Ok Cupid’s Ok Trends blog in January 2010.

The post was called The 4 Big Myths of Profile Pictures.

Before Ok Cupid declared it superior, it was likely 5-10% (200-300 photos split into 3 groups: smiling/not/flirty).

We know for certain that Ok Cupid knowingly made claims based on too little data because they had approximately 7 photos of male “flirty face” with no eye contact and they still drew conclusions about its effectiveness.

Perhaps it’s this personality type (not the photo’s characteristics out of context) that speak to which photo strategies worked best for him.

Finally, let’s chat for a moment about what happens when a highly popular dating site disseminates misinformation about what works best in guy’s dating pics: a new class of male dating photos is born.

After all, Ok Cupid’s findings were based on behavior, not just talk, right? Like everyone else, we believed in Ok Cupid’s conclusions. But every time we looked into this, we found the same thing: daters who used Photofeeler for photo testing were getting right-swipes like never before.

But the more data we collected about men’s dating photo attractiveness, the more it became undeniable: Ok Cupid’s advice wasn’t raising men’s photo scores. In fact, users reported 3-5x (200-400%) more matches!

Truthfully, even if a particular photo strategy showed a slight difference in average effectiveness, the individual photos score all over the map.

That’s because certain strategies may work better for certain people or in certain contexts. Photofeeler is a tool for testing profile pics, as seen in Time, Forbes, The Today Show, and more.

Then we ran each picture through a variety of analysis scripts (in our case, neural nets that detected smiles and eye contact) as well as tagged each one by hand until total agreement was reached. The explanation given (that they “[feared it] would skew [their] results”) is no explanation at all.

Tags: , ,